Contents
- Symposium – Balancing Fairness with Finality: An Examination of Post-Conviction Review
- Introduction
Justice Jon D. Levy
- Articles
- Federal Habeas Review of State Court Convictions: Incoherent Law but an Essential Right
Lynn Adelman - Appealing to Empathy: Counsel’s Obligation to Present Mitigating Evidence for Juveniles in Adult Court
Beth Caldwell - Post-Trial Judicial Review of Criminal Convictions: A Comparative Study of the United States and Finland
Christopher M. Johnson - A Comment of Christopher Johnson’s “Post-Trial Judicial Review of Criminal Convictions: A Comparative Study of the United States and Finland”
Malick W. Ghachem - Yikes! Was I Wrong? A Second Look at the Viability of Monitoring Capital Post-Conviction Counsel
Celestine Richards McConville - Contingent Compensation of Post-Conviction Counsel: A Modest Proposal to Identify Meritorious Claims and Reduce Wasteful Government Spending
Christopher T. Robertson - Commissioning Innocence and Restoring Confidence: the North Carolina Innocence Inquiry Commission and the Missing Deliberative Citizen
Mary Kelly Tate - Adjudicated Juveniles and Collateral Relief
Joshua A. Tepfer and Laura H. Nirider - Case Notes
- Tipping the Scales?: Maine Adopts the Continuing Negligent Treatment Doctrine in Baker v. Farrand
Michael P. Beers - McGarvey v. Whittredge: Continued Uncertainty in Maine’s Intertidal Zone
Benjamin Donahue - Anthem Health Plans of Maine, Inc. v. Superintendent of Insurance: Judicial Restraint or Judicial Abdication?
David Sorensen
